Saturday, January 19, 2008
Queery
Why do I seemingly have so few male readers and so many readers of the female persuasion?
How to explain this gender gap (to use the overused phrase of pundits and media blarecasters)?
Is it something I said? Does it point to gender issues of my own that I am struggling to suppress swimming against a Freudian tidal wave of "whatever"?
Is it my clothes? My accessories (which would make me an Accessory After the Fact, as they say in crime stories, as if I would know, not being a frequent reader of that genre, which almost spells g-e-n-d-e-r, except for the D)?
Is it that the blogging demographic skews "chick," to put it technically?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Today has been a banner day: solid work prospects and a Washington Post Style Invitational three-peat : Report From Week 749 in which we ask...
-
We know society exhibits moral outrage over serial killings, as well it should. But why the widespread apathy over the death throes of the s... -
It's not year's end, but we're nearly halfway there. Here's my running list of books read so far this year, in the order of ...
7 comments:
Mmm I think women are more consistent in what they do/read. They'll come back, ya see?
Christy's right. But that's because she is of the female persuasion like me. So I'm siding with her.
Queery - I get it. hahahahaha
woops, forgot to say I like the new look, PK
Am I the 1% that defines your maladroit not malevolent nor moronic male viewers?
Christy, Patti,
Really? I thought women exulted in changing like the weather. Little did I know.
Patti,
Thanks. I'm beginning to like it too. Change. All about change. My young 'un urged me to experiment.
Ralph,
Indeed. You may comprise my male demographic in its entirety. Thanks.
PK
Dunno, but you could try this...
Puss
I use blogland to explore the mysterious minds of women, mostly. I know how blokes think and I get enough male stimulation offline.
Simple as that.
Post a Comment